Search
ebook thumbnail 3 ways Payers Improve Provider Credentialing

3 Ways Payers Improve Provider Credentialing

External distractions. Data inaccuracies. Information delays. When problems arise during provider credentialing, they drain your most valuable resources. Staff time and reimbursement revenue are lost, but there are also less tangible consequences, such as decreased customer satisfaction among members and providers.

To address this, your organization must take every measure to cost-effectively facilitate high-quality patient care. The burden ultimately lies with you, as well as the clinicians you partner with, to ensure patient safety, satisfaction, and positive clinical outcomes before rewarding providers with optimal reimbursement.

As a healthcare payer, you understand how challenging and time-consuming credentialing can be. Provider data is constantly changing, which requires the transfer of multiple layers of sensitive information among participants on an ongoing basis. On top of that, your organization must comply with various accreditation standards, such as those set by the National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA), as well as state and federal regulations like those from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

What’s different about credentialing at payer organizations?

Payer credentialing of providers is highly regulated and labor-intensive, often taking three to six months to complete. While the process overlaps in some areas with what health systems employ to onboard clinicians, there are unique challenges for payer organizations.

For example:

  • Compared to hospitals and health systems, payer organizations are more likely to gather and analyze providers’ utilization data and other metrics related to value and cost containment. This effort is essential for controlling costs while delivering high-quality care to members.
  • Meeting contract obligations with diverse provider organizations requires ongoing visibility into contract assets to appropriately adjust in-network providers.
  • Staff must accurately track clinician-level details, including provider IDs, date ranges, tax identifiers, services offered, panel statuses, and directory flags, such as whether a provider’s address is correct or whether they’re currently accepting new patients.

New challenges in a changing environment

Alongside long-standing concerns about cost, quality, and compliance, new external pressures are impacting healthcare payers. These challenges include:

  • Reviewing more complex cost-of-care scenarios, which necessitates constant policy and procedural updates.
  • Processing an increased volume of claims as more patients seek record levels of healthcare services, resulting in heavier administrative workloads.
  • Managing acute staff shortages, particularly in entry and mid-level customer service roles.
  • Addressing low staff morale, often due to inadequate training and a lack of technological tools to manage growing workloads. A survey by symplr revealed that nearly 40% of all credentialing specialists believe they need additional knowledge or skills to perform their roles successfully in the future.
  • Recovering from high-profile mistakes reported in the media, such as insurance companies improperly billing patients for services or allegations from staff that profits are prioritized over member welfare.

Additionally, recent NCQA updates have further shortened credentialing verification timelines, requiring prompt and accurate completion of the process. Failure to meet standards may result in verification needing to be restarted, further straining resources. The requirement to monitor practitioner licensure expiration adds an additional burden, making automation a worthwhile consideration. For your organization to help rein in general healthcare costs effectively, smart strategies are critical to streamline and improve provider credentialing processes from start to finish.

1. Centralize provider data management

A single source of truth for accurate, dynamic provider data offers invaluable advantages. When unified profiles are validated against primary sources and made accessible to the appropriate stakeholders, they enhance efficiency, compliance, and service quality.

Data management software simplifies data gathering, allows adherence to regulatory changes, and ensures secure access. It reduces the administrative burden on both providers and credentialing staff. Software as a service (SaaS) is particularly well-suited for centralized data management.

Clean, current provider data is crucial for reliable directories, smooth patient care, and regulatory compliance. However, provider data from various sources is often siloed across departments, leading to communication gaps, duplicate requests, and delays in processes.

Centralizing provider data helps eliminate inefficiencies by reducing duplication, accelerating verification, and lowering administrative costs. Specific benefits include:

  • TRACKING PROVIDERS: Medicare billing privileges can be revoked if providers don’t report ownership changes or adverse legal actions within 30 days (or 90 days for other changes). A central system helps streamline tracking.
  • MANAGING PROVIDER DATA: An estimated 2-3% of provider demographic data changes every month, making regular updates essential. Even small errors, such as an incorrect address, can cause delays.
  • COMPLYING WITH THE NO SURPRISES ACT: Updated directories ensure providers are correctly verified and attested as in-network, preventing surprises in care and speeding up the removal process for those who aren’t compliant.

2. Expedite credentialing with tools tailored for managed care

Automation is vital to handle the high workload and promote transparency in payer[1]specific workflows. By utilizing batch processing, web crawlers, and form automation, payers can increase efficiencies in primary source verification and credentialing. Instead of having staff manually verify credentials via calls or emails to licensing boards, medical schools, and databases like the National Practitioner Data Bank, automated tools can perform these tasks. This saves time, reduces errors, and ensures compliance.

3. Partner with a credentialing verification organization (CVO)

When facing high credentialing volumes, many payers either build their own credentialing verification organization (CVO) or outsource these tasks to an experienced provider.

CVOs with NCQA-accredited services offer end-to-end credentialing solutions. Outsourcing can reduce administrative burdens, freeing staff to focus on tasks that require expertise. For instance, technologies like CAQH ProView can standardize provider data collection via electronic forms, enhancing overall efficiency.

CVO partners provide valuable support during short-staffed periods, mergers, acquisitions, or other organizational shifts. They also enable payers to adapt to unexpected crises, such as those experienced during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Looking to improve your credentialing process?

Automate and optimize your provider data management with symplr. Our solutions provide a single source of truth for credentialing, contracting, network management, and quality performance improvement. symplr Payer’s cloud-based healthcare provider management software streamlines:

stats image 1

Credentialing

Contracting
management

Provider
relations

Automated
workflows

stats image 2

Partner with us to elevate your credentialing processes and improve outcomes for your provider and member communities. Visit our website to learn more or request a demo today.